Q&As

In light of coronavirus (COVID-19), is arbitration preferable over litigation as a method of dispute resolution given the increased flexibility inherent in arbitration proceedings generally?

read titleRead full title
Published on: 23 March 2020
imgtext

Clare Ambrose, Twenty Essex

This is a ‘once in a generation’ challenge. We will see over the next months how the court system and the arbitration community respond. Arbitration is more flexible, and it is already common for directions to be made electronically, CMCs to be heard by telephone and disputes to be resolved by documents only. It is hoped that arbitration will be agile to meet the needs of parties. If so, and virtual hearings (or even partially virtual hearings) start to work well, then they will become an attractive feature. Corporations weathering this crisis will be mindful of resilience for the next one. Arbitration will be attractive if it is seen to work in times of crisis. If it becomes cheaper and more sustainable too then that must be a bonus.

Hamish Lal, Akin Gump

The tangible and significant impacts of coronavirus further support the notion that arbitration is preferable over litigation as a method of

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Dispute resolution definition
What does Dispute resolution mean?

pension scheme disputes between the member and the trustees can be resolved using a range of different methods including internal dispute resolution, TPAS, which operates a network of volunteer advisers, the Pensions Ombudsman, the courts and alternative dispute resolution by way of arbitration or mediation.

Popular documents