Dispute Resolution analysis: An interim anti-suit injunction, obtained in breach of the duty of full and frank disclosure has been largely set aside, albeit not as a result of that breach. On a substantive review of the merits, the court found a want of ostensible authority binding the parties to letters of engagement signed by another group company which contained the exclusive jurisdiction clauses on which the anti-suit injunctions had been sought. Written by Phillip Patterson, barrister, Gatehouse Chambers.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE
To read the full news article, register for a free Lexis+ trial
**Trials are provided to all LexisNexis content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisNexis services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
* denotes a required field
Applicable law—common law (contract)This Practice Note sets out when the common law of England and Wales applies to determine the applicable law in respect of contract claims. It sets out the process by which the courts of England and Wales will apply the common law to determine which law is
Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions, a form of injunction used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an injunction.
Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the position under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) where enforcement proceedings for a foreign judgment are brought in the courts of England and Wales and there
Rome I—application and interpretationThis Practice Note provides an explanation as to when and why Regulation (EC) 593/2008, Rome I was introduced. It covers the implementation of Regulation (EC) 593/2008, Rome I and the countries which are signatories, and therefore subject to the regulation, and
0330 161 1234